Jump to content

Miracium

Moderator
  • Content count

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Country

    Canada

Miracium last won the day on February 25 2017

Miracium had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

43 Excellent

3 Followers

About Miracium

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

804 profile views
  1. Happy Holidays

    Happy Holidays!
  2. Ah dang it, I forgot about this one regarding admin impersonation. Let's say there's an admin named SomeAdminXI (capital i) What about some impersonator creates an account called SomeAdminXl (lower case L) and starts going around claiming to be admin. Should that be a perma ban?
  3. Ban Length: Game Ruin - Part 2

    I would also like to add that ghosting includes maliciously telling the enemy team to use skills(Example: Zeus's ultimate) because one of your teammates is low hp. This is in the guidelines but just wanted to make this note as a reminder to anyone reading this even though the poll is now closed.
  4. Yes because it's written with a white highlight. If I had a last "world", it would be the world of Miracium but I should have said no.
  5. Bigger elo bot

    In LoD, used to do agi morph, basher first item.
  6. Plays "Just Say No" card. C
  7. So this seems like a dual operating system that I see in my school labs where there's an option to switch between windows and mac. This is a solution on the mac user itself but not necessarily the map. Though better than nothing.
  8. Then there's a sign of "bragging" when you beat a stacked team.
  9. Topic of the beast

    I prefer 777,
  10. Public Ban Reports

    I can think of this being similar to a ticket system except the fact that the reporter cannot view how it was processed. Maybe in some way that only the reporter can see their reports that they reported and when it is reviewed, they can see any additional comments posted by the mods. I do think considering what has happened recently, perhaps it's best for ban reports to not be public.
  11. Resignation

    Happy "belated" Birthday!
  12. Dead for Nothing

    I know in 6.85, you can also deny heroes if they are under the effect of invoker's meteor. If you time it, you can get it. I think this works if the heroes are under some dot effect (damage over time).
  13. Fat Pudge? Fat Pudge!

    That's a lot of hp I would love to have in LoD. Wait.. morph, adaptiveness(+20-40 something str), flesh heap, dismember, return (centaur passive). And dispersion combined.. Str manic gets killed by a silver edge.
  14. Usually I prefer people to watch the replay to be sure if it is breaking the rules. Some exceptions could be obvious like destroying all items or selling all items to ruin the game and certain intentional feeding. However, most of the time especially for maphack, I would encourage people to watch a replay before reporting. So I assume this idea is for obvious game ruin and not things like suspected maphack. For selecting who should be able to use this command, the next question is: Who should be able to use this command? Do we include everyone who has made good reports? I guess that's a check off. But what about people who wants to have access to this command? Do we need a section for people to request to have access to it? Or does staff pick and choose based on the behavior of certain players they see in game? Do we now have people who feel left out? I guess we do? I don't know. The idea is good if you have that point of view of obvious rule violations but in terms of practically (probably the wrong word I used here), I'm not sure if this would be a great idea if suddenly a bunch of people who don't deserve to use the command wants to use the command. For commands like this, I feel it's best to either give it to everyone or none at all. But again, that's my opinion and maybe you'll disagree.
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.